Jan de Bray almost certainly painted this compelling double portrait in May 1664 as a posthumous tribute to his parents, shortly after they had succumbed to the plague in Haarlem. This stark double-profile image has a timeless quality that is enhanced by the parents' simple black dress and austere surroundings. Jan represented Salomon (1597–1664) with his left hand outstretched as though he were about to speak, a rhetorical pose that identifies him as a man who excelled at intellectual pursuits. His skullcap, dark mantle, and simple white collar—all common scholarly attire—reinforce this association. De Bray stipulated in his will that the painting should be given to the city of Haarlem in order to preserve the memory of his parents as respected citizens of the city, a stipulation, however, that was never carried out.
The profile portrait was a common format on Roman coins, cameos, and celebratory medals depicting individuals of high birth and rank. The tradition of portraying famous men and women in this manner was revived in the Renaissance and continued in the Netherlands in the seventeenth century, specifically in representations of the Prince and Princess of Orange. De Bray's use of overlapping profile portraits, however, is found only rarely in seventeenth-century Dutch and Flemish painting; an important precedent, Agrippina and Germanicus, by Peter Paul Rubens (1577–1640), is also in the National Gallery of Art’s collection. De Bray, who may have been familiar with that work, chose a similar pose to imbue this image of his parents with classical ideals of dignity and permanence.
Jan de Bray painted this remarkable double portrait of his parents in 1664, shortly after they had succumbed to the plague that ravaged Haarlem from 1663 to 1664.
The painting, which is not dated, has also been placed earlier in De Bray’s career: Joachim Wolfgang Von Moltke, "Jan de Bray," Marburger Jahrbuch für Kunstwissenschaft 11–12 (1938–1939): 426, dated it about 1661, and Jeroen Giltaij, in Dutch Classicism in Seventeenth-Century Painting, ed. Albert Blankert (Rotterdam, 1999), 276–279, no. 53, dated it around 1660.
Salomon de Bray was a painter, architect, and urban planner who probably learned to paint in his native Amsterdam before moving to Haarlem to study with
Salomon de Bray is mentioned as an assayer (vinder) on the board of the Saint Luke’s Guild in Haarlem in 1632, 1633, and 1639, and as the head of the guild (deken) in 1634 and 1640. Until 1640 he is identified as an architect (architekt). In 1640, however, he is mentioned as a painter also (schilder en bouwmeester). Hessel Miedema, De archiefbescheiden van het St. Lukasgilde te Haarlem: 1497–1798, 2 vols. (Alphen aan den Rijn, 1980), 2:1057–1058.
De Bray painted a portrait of his mother in 1657 (National Gallery, London). See Pieter Biesboer, ed., Painting Family: The De Brays, Master Painters of 17th Century Holland (Zwolle, 2008), no. 19, 72–73.
De Bray presumably painted this work between May 11, 1664, the date of his father’s death, and June 17, 1664, when the artist stated in his will that he would bequeath “the likeness of his foresaid deceased father and mother standing in a single piece and painted from the side” to Gaeff Meynertsz Fabritius (1602–1666), who was a goldsmith and, like Salomon, an important member of the Saint Luke’s Guild.
Gaeff Meynertsz Fabritius appears in the records of the guild of gold- and silversmiths (which was part of the Saint Luke’s Guild until 1639) as an assayer (keurmeester) in 1627 and 1636. (The terms vinder and keurmeester both mean assayer, a person in charge of quality control.) In 1635 Fabritius was both the head (deken) of the board of the gold- and silversmiths and the main assayer as well as the treasurer (penningmeester) of the board of the Saint Luke’s Guild. In 1634 and 1640, both years that Salomon de Bray was the head of the Guild, Fabritius was part of the board as well (either as assayer or as assayer and treasurer). In the general guild records Fabritius is identified as a goldsmith (goudsmid) until 1640, when he is said to be an engraver and sculptor (graveerder en figuursnijder). Hessel Miedema, De archiefbescheiden van het St. Lukasgilde te Haarlem: 1497–1798, 2 vols. (Alphen aan den Rijn, 1980), 2:1050–1051, 1057–1058.
See Pieter Biesboer, ed., Painting Family: The De Brays, Master Painters of 17th Century Holland (Zwolle, 2008), no. 6, 88.
See Jeroen Giltaij in Albert Blankert, ed., Dutch Classicism in Seventeenth-Century Painting (Rotterdam, 1999), 279 n. 4: “het conterfeytsel van sijn voorn. overleden vader ende moeder staende in een stuck ende van ter seyden geschildert.”
Jan de Bray also painted two large portraits historiés depicting members of his extended family, including Salomon and Anna, as participants at the Banquet of Antony and Cleopatra (the first, dated 1652, is at Hampton Court in the collection of her Majesty the Queen; and the second, dated 1669, is in the Currier Museum of Art, Manchester, New Hampshire). These paintings also commemorated the ideals for which the De Bray family stood and the lasting bonds that united parents, children, and spouses. See Arthur K. Wheelock Jr., Jan de Bray and the Classical Tradition, exh. brochure (National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, 2004), 10–12, no. 4.
Technical examinations indicate that De Bray initially painted Salomon’s left arm hanging at his side: x-radiographs [see
A photographic or digital image analysis method that visually records an object's ability to absorb or transmit x-rays. The differential absorption pattern is useful for examining an object's internal structure as well as for comparing the variation in pigment types.
The additional panels measure 4 centimeters at the left and 5.2 centimeters at the right. For further discussion of these changes, see Technical Notes.
The profile portrait was a common format on Roman coins, cameos, and celebratory medals depicting individuals of high birth and rank. This tradition was revived in Renaissance portraits of famous men and women and is also found in the seventeenth-century Netherlands, specifically in representations of the Prince and Princess of Orange painted in the early 1630s by
See Peter van der Ploeg et al., Princely Patrons: The Collection of Frederick Henry of Orange and Amalia of Solms in the Hague (The Hague, 1997), 132–134, nos. 9a–b.
Rose-Marie and Eijk van Otterloo Collection. See Frederik J. Duparc, ed., Golden: Dutch and Flemish Masterworks from the Rose-Marie and Eijk van Otterloo Collection (New Haven, 2011), no.13, 100–105.
For an image of this double portrait (Hendrik van Balen, Self-Portrait with His Wife, Margareta Briers, c. 1625, Sint-Jacobskerk, Antwerp), see Rudolf Ekkart and Quentin Buvelot, eds., Dutch Portraits: The Age of Rembrandt and Frans Hals (London, 2007), 88, fig. 6a, and Pieter Biesbooer, ed., Painting Family: The De Brays, Master Painters of 17th Century Holland (Zwolle, 2008), 92, fig. 29a. There is no evidence, however, that De Bray ever traveled to Antwerp.
In this respect, De Bray’s double portrait differs from Jacob van Campen’s Double Portrait of Constantijn Huygens and Suzanna van Baerle, c. 1635 (Royal Picture Gallery Mauritshuis, The Hague), because of the momentary quality of Suzanna’s pose as she turns and looks out at the viewer. For this portrait, see Ben Broos and Ariane van Suchtelen, eds., Portraits in the Mauritshuis, 1430–1790 (The Hague, 2004), 63–68.
De Bray’s restrained brushwork and meticulous modeling of forms perfectly complemented the commemorative nature of this double portrait. He precisely rendered the specific physiognomy of each of his parents, from his mother’s high forehead and curved nostrils to the subtle creases around his father’s deeply set eyes. With great sensitivity to both line and volume he indicated the glistening strands of Salomon’s wavy hair and thin goatee. He captured the differences of texture in the clothes, from the soft, velvety quality of his father’s black robe to the smoothness of his stiff white collar, carefully bending up its lower edge to enhance the image’s three-dimensionality. Unlike his Haarlem compatriot
I would like to thank Perry Chapman for stressing this point to me.
Arthur K. Wheelock Jr.
April 24, 2014
Marks and Labels
The artist [c. 1627-1697]; possibly bequeathed to Gaeff Fabritius, former burgomaster of Haarlem. John Charles Robinson [1824-1913], London; (his sale, Hôtel Drouot, Paris, 7-8 May 1868, no. 11); Reiset, for Princess Mathilde [1820-1904, née Mathilde L.M. Bonaparte], Paris; (her estate sale, Galerie Georges Petit, Paris, 17-21 May 1904, 1st day, no. 21). Agénor, duc de Gramont [1857-1925], Paris; (his sale, Galerie Georges Petit, Paris, 22 May 1925, no. 7); Joseph Fuller Feder [d. 1944], New York; by inheritance to his daughter, Mrs. George Monroe Moffett [d. 1956, née Odette Feder, formerly the Countess du Bourg de Bozas and Mrs. J. Ronald McCrindle], New York; by inheritance to her son, Joseph F. McCrindle [1923-2008], New York; gift 2001 to NGA.
- Loan to display with permanent collection, Brooklyn Museum of Art, 1957-1981.
- Dutch Seventeenth-Century Portraiture: The Golden Age, The John and Mable Ringling Museum of Art, Sarasota, 1980-1981, no. 13, repro.
- Loan to display with permanent collection, The Art Museum, Princeton University, 1981-1999.
- Dutch and Flemish Paintings from New York Private Collections, National Academy of Design, New York, 1988, no. 6, repro.
- Dutch Classicism in Seventeenth-Century Painting, Städelsches Kunstinstitut, Frankfurt; Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam, 1999-2000, no. 53, repro.
- Small Northern European Portraits from The Walters Art Gallery, Baltimore, National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C., 2000, brochure checklist no. 39.
- Jan De Bray and the Classical Tradition, National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C., 2005, brochure no. 2, repro.
- Dutch Portraits: The Age of Rembrandt and Frans Hals, The National Gallery, London; Royal Picture Gallery Mauritshuis, The Hague, 2007-2008, no. 6, repro.
- Painting Family: The De Brays, Master Painters of 17th Century Holland, Frans Hals Museum, Haarlem; Dulwich Picture Gallery, London, 2008, no. 29, repro.
- Moltke, Joachim Wolfgang von. "Jan de Bray." Marburger Jahrbuch für Kunstwissenschaft 11/12 (1938/1939): 426, 483-484, no. 177a.
- Marel, Ary van der. "De kunstschilders de Bray en hun familie." De Nederlandsche Leeuw 81 (January 1964): 6-26.
- Wilson, William Harry. Dutch Seventeenth-Century Portraiture: the Golden Age. Exh. cat. The John and Mable Ringling Museum of Art, Sarasota, 1980: unpaginated, no. 13.
- Adams, Ann Jensen. Dutch and Flemish Paintings from New York Private Collections. Exh. cat. National Academy of Design, New York, 1988: no. 6, repro.
- Broos, Ben P. J., ed. Great Dutch Paintings from America. Exh. cat. Royal Picture Gallery Mauritshuis, The Hague; Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco. The Hague and Zwolle, 1990: 193 fig. 2.
- Broos, Ben P. J., and Marijn Schapelhouman. Nederlandse tekenaars geboren tussen 1600 en 1660. Zwolle, 1993: 62, fig. d.
- Blankert, Albert. Dutch classicism in seventeenth-century painting. Exh. cat. Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam; Städelsches Kunstinstitut, Frankfurt am Main. Rotterdam, 1999: 276-279, 299 no. 53, repro.
- Broos, Ben P. J., and Ariane van Suchtelen. Portraits in the Mauritshuis, 1430-1790. The Hague, 2004: 64.
- Wheelock, Arthur K., Jr. Jan de Bray and the Classical Tradition. Exhibition brochure. National Gallery of Art, Washington, 2004: 8-9, no. 2, repro.
- Van Wagenberg-Ter Hoeven, Anke A. "A Matter of Mistaken Identity. In Search of a New Title for Rubens's Tiberius and Agrippina." Artibus et historiae 26, no. 52 (2005): 116, 117 fig. 3, 126 n. 9.
- Ekkart, Rudolf E.O., and Quentin Buvelot. Dutch portraits: the age of Rembrandt and Frans Hals. Translated by Beverly Jackson. Exh. cat. National Gallery, London; Royal Picture Gallery Mauritshuis, The Hague. London, 2007: 88-89, no. 6, repro.
- Biesboer, Pieter, ed. Painting Family: the De Brays: Master Painters of the 17th century Holland. Exh. cat. Frans Hals Museum, Haarlem; Dulwich Picture Gallery, London. Zwolle, 2008: 92-93, no. 29, repro.
- Grasselli, Margaret M., and Arthur K. Wheelock, Jr., eds. The McCrindle Gift: A Distinguished Collection of Drawings and Watercolors. Exh. cat. National Gallery of Art. Washington, 2012: 5, 14, fig. 2, 19, repro. 184.
- Seifert, Christian Tico. "'in een stuck ende van ter seyden geschildert': Jan de Bray's Portrait of the Artist's Parents" in Face book: Studies on Dutch and Flemish portraiture of the 16th-18th centuries. Liber amicorum presented to Rudolf E.O. Ekkart on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Edited by Edwin Buijsen, Charles Dumas, and Volker Manuth. Leiden, 2012: 365-372, repro. 366.
The painting was executed on a panel constructed from three boards of vertically grained white oak. The back of the panel is beveled but shims have been attached to the beveled areas to accommodate a cradle. The ground is composed of two layers: a light gray layer under a brownish gray one. Though the green background paint was found to be consistent on all three boards, the layers between the ground and the green paint differ. Both the right and left boards contain a dark gray layer over the ground. This layer is absent from the center plank, but both the center and left boards contain a buff colored layer just below the green background, which is absent from the right plank. Despite these inconsistencies, the pigments of the green paint are consistent on all three boards and the brushstrokes of the green paint continue across the joins, indicating that the two outer boards were added by the artist before the background was painted.
De Bray used a series of short, discrete brushstrokes to apply the paint with low impasto. He built up the flesh tones with opaque paint, but used glazes in the dark areas. The X-radiographs show several artist’s changes: the woman’s dress was simplified and it originally had a collar that was painted out; the man’s arm was not originally raised.
The painting is in good condition. The panel exhibits a few short vertical splits extending down from the top edge and up from the bottom edge. There are minor scattered indentations and chips in the support along the edges. There is old damage in the lower right corner adjacent to the join line. The inpainting in this area has discolored. There is additional old inpainting in the man’s sleeve, close to his wrist. The painting has not undergone treatment at the National Gallery of Art.
 The wood was analyzed by the NGA Scientific Research department (see report dated December 29, 2010, in NGA Conservation department files). All three boards were found to be white oak.
 Cross-sections from all three boards were taken and analyzed with light microscopy as well as scanning electron microscopy in conjunction with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) by the NGA Scientific Research department (see report dated December 29, 2010, in NGA Conservation department files).
Related IconClass Terms
- artist +Peter Paul Rubens + influence of
- chamber of rhetoric
- historical persons +Salomon de Bray
- etc. +Flanders + influence of