To his contemporaries, Jan van der Heyden was famous not only as a painter but also as an inventor and entrepreneur whose activities had a major impact on daily life in Amsterdam. In 1669 he devised a systematic plan for lighting the city’s quays and streets using more efficient oil lamps in pole-mounted lanterns. In 1672 Jan and his brother Nicolaes developed a vastly improved fire pump with leather hoses that produced a constant jet of water, and soon after he established a manufacturing plant for the production of fire engines, which made him a wealthy man.
As a painter Van der Heyden specialized in cityscapes and country mansions. His images of refined elegance and prosperity convey the importance that the status-conscious urban elite of the Dutch Republic attached to owning a country estate. Van der Heyden’s technique was so meticulous that it seems he delineated every course of brickwork on his buildings. Despite such a devotion to detail, many of his architectural scenes, including this work, are pure inventions. Van der Heyden did paint numerous country estates in Holland, but this marble mansion appears to be a product of the artist’s imagination. While the classical structure echoes the buildings of Palladio and the decorative sculptural elements also reveal Italian influences, the figures, which were probably painted by Adriaen van de Velde (1636–1672), are unmistakably Dutch. The great house with its sunlit formal gardens may evoke an idealized world, but at the elaborate gateway of the brick walls surrounding the gardens, an elegant gentleman encounters a beggar with her baby. Much of the painting’s appeal arises from the contrast between the easy informality of the figures and the restrained formality of the architectural setting.
This painting evokes the pleasures of elegant country life. Gentle sunlight illuminates the façade of a handsome Palladian villa situated on a small rise in a park. Passing through the magnificent classical gateway, a master and his servant approach a waiting beggar woman with a child on her back. In front of the gate a man seated on a fragment of antique sculpture adjusts the collars of two sleek hunting dogs. The casual poses of the other figures—the two men who in eager discussion lean against the garden balustrade, the servant who lounges in the doorway of the villa, and the various dogs who sniff, urinate, or curl up and doze—contribute to the liveliness of the scene. Much of the painting’s appeal arises from the contrast between the easy informality of the figures and the restrained formality of the setting. Although the painting is not signed, its attribution to Jan van der Heyden is not in doubt; the broad areas of light and shadow, the minute detail, and especially the brick walls are hallmarks of his style.
While best known for his cityscapes, Van der Heyden was also the foremost Dutch painter of country houses.
Helga Wagner, Jan van der Heyden, 1637–1712 (Amsterdam, 1971), lists 152 views of Dutch and foreign cities and 28 views of country palaces.
Land was not only a safe investment, but on even a small plot one could raise one’s own fruit and vegetables and other household provisions. Furthermore, landholdings, from small vegetable plots to large country estates, provided retreats in nature away from the tensions of city life. Finally, landownership in itself had a certain prestige, for during earlier periods it had been the prerogative of the nobility.
Behind the house was a sunken garden carved out of the dune.
Helga Wagner, Jan van der Heyden, 1637–1712 (Amsterdam, 1971), nos. 133–138.
The identification of the country estate in the National Gallery’s painting has long been a matter of discussion. Smith and Hofstede de Groot both considered the subject to be the Castle of Rozendaal near Arnhem, but the villa bears no resemblance to the building represented in numerous views of Rozendaal.
See, for example, the anonymous pencil drawings of Het Huis Rozendaal, bij Arnhem, dated 1707, Album L3, Museum Nairac (neg. RKD Top. L. 1670 in the collection of the Afdeling Topografie of the RKD), which show the castle in its medieval state before it was remodeled in the Palladian style. Its appearance after remodeling can be seen in an engraving by Peter Schenk, pl. 9, in the collection of engravings titled Nederland, in the Dumbarton Oaks Garden Library collection. This small palace with extensive formal gardens is now destroyed, but it would have been well known in the eighteenth century.
In a letter dated June 13, 1968, J. van der Klooster, keeper of the Topographical Department, RKD, stated that a villa like the one in An Architectural Fantasy never existed in the Netherlands (in NGA curatorial files). See also letters in NGA curatorial files from Eric Forssman, director of the Kunstgeschichtliches Institut of the University of Freiburg (February 8, 1981); Wilhelm Diedenhofen (August 12, 1981); and Guido de Werd, director of the Municipal Museum of Cleves (August 8, 1981). Helga Wagner, Jan van der Heyden, 1637–1712 (Amsterdam, 1971), 39, suggests that the villa is based on an engraving or an architectural project for a French château. She entitles the painting “Französisches Gartenschlosschen.” The villa differs from seventeenth-century French châteaux in three important respects, however: the gentle pitch of the roof, the absence of dormers and chimneys, and the façade consisting of only three blocks. In contemporary French châteaux, the façade was usually more complex, consisting of five or more blocks, with the central pavilion complemented by projecting end pavilions. See plates in Louis Hautecoeur, Histoire d’architecture classique en France (Paris, 1948), 2: parts 1 and 2.
This assessment is supported by an analysis of the building’s architectural elements. The Palladian-style villa is striking for the apparent classicism of the building and the abundance of architectural and freestanding sculpture.
I would like to thank Sally M. Wages for her research into the architectural character of this château, which has formed the basis for this entry.
The façade reflects the new concept of a building as a symmetrical organization of blocks. Giant orders, statues at the roofline, urns of carved fruit, and panels with festoons were motifs widely adopted by Dutch builders. They were prominently displayed on the Amsterdam Town Hall. While deeply projecting central blocks were rare, they were used on the side façades of Amalia van Solm’s country residence, the Huis ten Bosch, and on the front façade of the Amsterdam Town Hall. See Helga Wagner, Jan van der Heyden, 1637–1712 (Amsterdam, 1971), nos. 133–138 for the Huis ten Bosch and nos. 1–4 for the Amsterdam Town Hall. Other architectural elements in the painting, while found in Italian treatises, were not common in Dutch buildings of the time. Steeply pitched roofs with dormer windows and chimneys were still standard in northern Europe. The gently pitched roof without dormers and chimneys here corresponds to Palladio’s designs suitable for a mild climate. The stringcourse that continues behind the pilasters was not adopted by Dutch builders, but is a frequent motif in façade elevations by Palladio and his compatriots. See Andrea Palladio, I Quattro Libri dell’ Architettura Universale (Milan, 1615; facsimile ed., 4 vols., Milan, 1968), 2:iii, 14; Sebastiano Serlio, I Sette Libri dell’ Architettura (Venice, 1584; facsimile ed., 2 vols., Bologna, 1978), 2: book 7:xlii–xliii, 103, 105; Vincenzo Scamozzi, L’Idea della Architettura Universale (1615; facsimile ed., 2 vols., Ridgewood, N.J., 1964), part 1, 2:viii, xiv, 126, 281.
For tombs, see Erwin Panofsky, Tomb Sculpture: Four Lectures on Its Changing Aspects from Ancient Egypt to Bernini, ed. H. W. Janson (New York, 1964), esp. fig. 331. For wall decorations see Douglas Lewis, The Drawings of Andrea Palladio (Washington, D.C., 1981), fig. 60. For triumphal arches see Joannes Boschius, Descriptio publicae gratulationis spectaculorum et ludorum, in adventu Sereniss. Principis Ernesti Archiducis Austriae (Antwerp, 1602), and Jean Gaspard Gevaerts, Pompa Introitus Honori … Serenissimi Prinicipis Ferdinandi Austriaci Hispaniarum Infantis (Antwerp, 1641; facsimile ed., London, 1972), pls. 15, 56, 90, 91. For frontispieces see J. Richard Judson and Carl van de Velde, Corpus Rubenianum Ludwig Burchard, Part XXI: Book Illustrations and Title Pages, 2 vols. (London, 1978), 2: pls. 26 and 55.
The combination of paired pilasters and a triangular pediment enclosing an arched opening, used on the villa’s façade and repeated in the gateway, may also have been drawn from decorative architecture. A similar combination of elements is seen in an engraving depicting one of the stages erected in Amsterdam in 1642 at the time of the visit of Queen Henrietta Maria of England.
Reproduced in Dirck P. Snoep, Praal en Propaganda: Triumfalia in de Noordelijke Nederlanden in de 16de en 17de eeuw (Alphen aan den Rijn, 1975), fig. 34. Another unusual architectural component found in this building and in one of the arches for Queen Henrietta Maria’s visit to Amsterdam is the stringcourse that continues behind the pilasters. Dirck P. Snoep, Praal en Propaganda: Triumfalia in de Noordelijke Nederlanden in de 16de en 17de eeuw (Alphen aan den Rijn, 1975), figs. 38 and 40, reproduces the design of the stages in Samuel Coster’s Beschrijvinge (Amsterdam, 1642).
Dirck P. Snoep, Praal en Propaganda: Triumfalia in de Noordelijke Nederlanden in de 16de en 17de eeuw (Alphen aan den Rijn, 1975), 78, figs. 42 and 43. The two side stages in fig. 42 incorporate the motif of crossed palms encircled by a wreath, a device that also ornaments the basement of the villa in An Architectural Fantasy.
Sebastiano Serlio, I Sette Libri dell’ Architettura (Venice, 1584; facsimile ed., 2 vols., Bologna, 1978), 2: book 6, fols. 4 recto, 7 recto, 19 recto, 20 verso, 26 verso. Serlio employs this combination of elements for the centerpiece of only one villa façade, book 7:xvii, 41, which is remarkably similar to that in An Architectural Fantasy.
Like most of Van der Heyden’s works, this painting is difficult to date precisely. The architectural character of the scene compares closely with his depictions of the Huis ten Bosch, one of which bears the date 1668.
Helga Wagner, Jan van der Heyden, 1637–1712 (Amsterdam, 1971), nos. 133–139.
The staffage figures have been traditionally, and probably rightly, attributed to
The earliest record of this painting, the 1816 Paris auction catalogue, states that the figures are by Adriaen van de Velde. Helga Wagner, Jan van der Heyden, 1637–1712 (Amsterdam, 1971), 101, accepts this attribution.
Simon Schama, The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age (New York, 1987), 573.
Arthur K. Wheelock Jr.
April 24, 2014
Marks and Labels
Woltgraft family, Kampen. Catellan family, Freiburg im Breisgau, before 1816; (sale, by Laneuville and Chariot, Paris, 16 January 1816, no. 6); Maurice Rubichon for Charles-Ferdinand de Bourbon, duc de Berry [1778-1820], Paris; by inheritance to his wife, Marie-Caroline-Ferdinande-Louise de Naples, duchesse de Berry [1798-1870], Paris; (De Berry exhibition and sale, Christie & Manson, London, April-June 1834, no. 112, apparently bought in); (De Berry sale, by Bataillard and Charles Pillet, Paris, 4-6 April 1837, no. 72); Hazard. Charles Heusch [c. 1775-1848], London, probably by 1838; by inheritance to his son, Frederick Heusch [1809-1870], London; acquired 1855 with the entire Heusch collection by Baron Lionel Nathan de Rothschild [1808-1879], London; by inheritance to his son, Alfred Charles de Rothschild [1842-1918], London and Halton House, near Wendover, Buckinghamshire; by inheritance to his nephew, Lionel Nathan de Rothschild [1882-1942], Exbury, Hampshire; by inheritance to his son, Edmund Leopold de Rothschild [1916-2009], Exbury; sold 1968 to (Thos. Agnew and Sons, Ltd., London); purchased 12 June 1968 by NGA.
- Possibly British Institution, 1838, no. 91.
- Exhibition of Works by the Old Masters. Winter Exhibition, Royal Academy of Arts, London, 1886, no. 83, as View of a Château.
- Dutch Pictures, 1450-1750, Royal Academy of Arts, London, 1952-1953, no. 469, as The Gate of a Palace.
- In the Light of Vermeer, Mauritshuis, The Hague, 1966, no. 31, as Chateau in a Park.
- In Memoriam, Ailsa Mellon Bruce, National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C., 1969, unnumbered checklist.
- Jan van der Heyden (1637-1712), Bruce Museum of Arts and Science, Greenwich, Connecticut; Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, 2006 -2007, no. 24, repro.
- Smith, John. A Catalogue Raisonné of the Works of the Most Eminent Dutch, Flemish and French Painters. 9 vols. London, 1829-1842: 5(1834):396, no. 87.
- Waagen, Gustav Friedrich. Treasures of Art in Great Britain: Being an Account of the Chief Collections of Paintings, Drawings, Sculptures, Illuminated Mss.. 3 vols. Translated by Elizabeth Rigby Eastlake. London, 1854: 2:256.
- Blanc, Charles. Le trésor de la curiosité. 2 vols. Paris, 1857–1858: 2(1858):135.
- Davis, Charles. A Description of the Works of Art Forming the Collection of Alfred de Rotchschild. 2 vols. London, 1884: 1: no. 34, repro.
- Hofstede de Groot, Cornelis. A Catalogue Raisonné of the Works of the Most Eminent Dutch Painters of the Seventeenth Century. 8 vols. Translated by Edward G. Hawke. London, 1907-1927: 8(1923): 397, no. 227.
- "Recent Accessions." Apollo 89 (February 1969): 155, repro.
- Wagner, Helga. Jan van der Heyden 1637-1712. Amsterdam, 1971: 39, 61, 101, no. 151, repro.
- National Gallery of Art. European paintings: An Illustrated Summary Catalogue. Washington, 1975: 174, repro.
- Wheelock, Arthur K., Jr. "Perspective and Its Role in the Evolution of Dutch Realism." In Perception and Pictorial Representation. Edited by Calvin F. Nodine and Dennis F. Fisher. New York, 1979: 113.
- Agnew, Geoffrey. A Dealer's Record. Agnew's 1967-1981. London, 1981: 9, 97, repro.
- Vries, Lyckle de. Jan van der Heyden. Amsterdam, 1984: 33-35, repro.
- Walker, John. National Gallery of Art, Washington. Rev. ed. New York, 1984: 295, no. 387, color repro.
- Wheelock, Arthur K., Jr. Dutch Painting in the National Gallery of Art. Washington, D.C., 1984: 40-41, color repro.
- National Gallery of Art. European Paintings: An Illustrated Catalogue. Washington, 1985: 201, repro.
- Schama, Simon. The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age. New York, 1987: 573, repro.
- National Gallery of Art. National Gallery of Art, Washington. New York, 1992: 139, repro.
- Wheelock, Arthur K., Jr. Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century. The Collections of the National Gallery of Art Systematic Catalogue. Washington, 1995: 107-112, color repro. 109.
- Waagen, Gustav Friedrich. Treasures of Art in Great Britain. Translated by Elizabeth Rigby Eastlake. Facsimile edition of London 1854. London, 2003: 2:256.
- Sutton, Peter C. Jan van der Heyden: (1637-1712). Exh. cat. Bruce Museum, Greenwich, Connecticut; Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. New Haven and London, 2006: 164-166, no. 24.
The support consists of a single piece of oak, with a horizontal grain. The back of the panel bears the inscription van der heyden, undoubtedly by another hand at a later date. The wood is covered with a thin white ground. Infrared reflectography at 1.1 to 1.8 microns reveals broad rapid brushstrokes. It is presumed that these correspond to the ground, since they are not visible in the paint layer. Infrared reflectography also shows a faint, precise drawing. No changes are evident in the drawing, but the ruled lines often extend past the architectural elements that they demarcate. The paint was applied fairly smoothly. It appears as though van der Heyden blocked in the colors and then applied the details wet-into-wet into each other on top of the dry base layer. Van der Heyden may have used a printmaking technique to create the brickwork. The paint does not bear any brushstrokes, nor do the lines taper, as strokes made with a brush typically do. In addition, the very fine lines in the architectural elements appear as though they were made with a ruling pen. Van der Heyden created the leaves in the trees by stippling. The figures were painted last, as evidenced by the fact that the brickwork extends under the figures.
In general, the painting is in fairly good condition. The panel has developed a moderate concave warp both along and across the grain. There are a number of fairly small cracks in the wood, including one about 10 centimeters long in the lower left corner, three smaller ones along the top edge, and another near the center of the bottom edge. In general, the edges of the panel have suffered minor damages, and the extreme top left corner is missing. Small losses of paint and ground associated with the damages to the support have occurred. There is extensive inpainting from past restorations throughout the sky. In some areas, particularly along the edges, these cover abrasion, wear, and small losses. In other areas, the retouching appears to be covering small horizontal, linear areas of abrasion along the raised parts of the woodgrain. Much of the retouching covers areas of original paint, and in the sky it is for the most part heavy, opaque, and discolored. Extensive strengthening has been carried out in certain areas, for example, in some of the clouds and in the balustrade. The surface of the painting is covered with a number of layers of aged, glossy varnish. No restoration on the painting has been undertaken since its acquisition.
 The wood was analyzed and determined to be oak by Dr. Peter Klein, Universität Hamburg. He performed dendrochronology on the panel and concluded that the earliest creation date for the painting is 1655 (see report dated February 17, 1987, in NGA Conservation department files).
Infrared reflectography was performed with a Santa Barbara focalplane array InSb camera fitted with H and K astronomy filters.
Related IconClass Terms
- country house
- the poor
- used symbolically
- the rich
- artist +Andrea Palladio + influence of
- historical person +Amalia van Solms