|
|
The Art of Painting
 |
| Detail of Clio from The Art of Painting |
The Art of Painting holds a special place within
Vermeer's oeuvre. While it displays all the captivating characteristics of
his artistic genius -- a carefully observed seventeenth-century Dutch interior
illuminated by softly diffused light, exquisitely painted details, and a
frozen moment imbued with psychological depth -- it stands apart from his other
works in its imposing scale and pronounced allegorical character.
The picture's personal significance to Vermeer is evident from the fact
that it apparently remained in his possession from the late 1660s, when it
was painted, until his death in 1675. Even though the family was left in
dire financial straits, the painting was not sold. On 24 February 1676
Vermeer's widow, Catharina Bolnes, transferred ownership of the work to her
mother, Maria Thins, to keep the picture out of the hands of creditors. The
legal document drawn up at this time provides the title of the work: "a
piece of painting [by] her Late husband in which was depicted The Art of
Painting [De Schilderkunst]." Unlike the descriptive titles usually given
to seventeenth-century paintings, this title focuses on the picture's
meaning, an indication that the image represents far more than an artist at
an easel, depicting a woman dressed as Clio, the muse of history. The title
also indicates that Vermeer incorporated the other significant
compositional elements -- map, tapestry, and chandelier -- to help convey his
conviction about the meaning and significance of the art of painting.
The issues Vermeer addressed here were not new. Ever since antiquity
artists and theorists had sought to define the qualities and ideals
paintings should include, and the significance they held for human beliefs
and understanding. Concurrent with these concerns were questions about the
artist's place in society, whether he should be considered a craftsman, on
a par with carpenters and goldsmiths, or a creative genius, such as poets
and philosophers. Finally, commentaries on the visual arts always imparted
an awareness of the enormous fame brought to a city or a nation by its
artists.
|
 |
| Samuel van Hoogstraten, Clio, etching, from Inleyding tot de Hooge
Schoole der Schilderkonst, published 1678, National Gallery of Art, Gift of
Arthur and Charlotte Vershbow, in Honor of the 50th Anniversary of the
National Gallery of Art |
Although these intellectual ideas belonged to an established tradition,
Vermeer's own interpretation was innovative. Rather than using a single
allegorical figure to embody his theme (see Painting and Illusionism), Vermeer chose to
present his allegory in the guise of an everyday scene that takes place in
a recognizable room filled with objects. The artist is dressed in an
elegant costume, which elevates him beyond the social level of an anonymous
craftsman. The distinctive doublet, decorated with slits
across its back and arms, is similar to garments worn on special occasions
in the early to mid-seventeenth century, perhaps to enhance the painting's
historicizing character.
The artist observes his model, who is dressed as Clio, the muse of
history. As he records her image carefully on his canvas, he is
not so much the recipient of the muse's inspiration as the agent through
whom she takes on life and significance. Clio wears a crown of laurel on
her head to denote honor, glory, and eternal life. In one hand she holds a
trumpet, which stands for fame, and in the other she clasps a thick folio,
perhaps a volume of Thucydides, which symbolizes history. These were the
attributes ascribed to her by Cesare Ripa in his
Iconologia, a sixteenth-century book of emblems and
personifications that was widely used by artists. It also became a source
for theorists, among them Vermeer's contemporary, Samuel van Hoogstraten,
whose treatise of 1678 contains an image of Clio almost exactly as
described by Ripa, with book and trumpet in hand.
|
|