Admission is always free Directions

Open today: 10:00 to 5:00

Members' Research Report Archive

The Real Scene: Painting, Life, and Place in China, 1450 – 1550

Lihong Liu
A. W. Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow, 2014 – 2016

Ju Jie, Hundred-Flower Islet, in Zhu Ming xian shou Wen Zhengming bashi shihua ce (Various Ming Talents Celebrating Wen Zhengming’s Eightieth Birthday: An Album of Poetry and Painting), 1549, album leaf (1 of 15). Chen Chi-te Collection, Taipei. Photograph courtesy Chen Chi-te

Art historians of different cultures have for the past century dealt with the issue of the relationship between art and reality. They have provided insights that go beyond cognitive and representational approaches to recognize the evocations, resonances, and empathies between artistic formulations and people’s real-life experiences, often proving the implied boundaries to be blurred or nonexistent. Taking on this perennially thorny problem to question what is “real” in art, my book tackles the notion of shijing (real scene) in Chinese painting theory and practice by focusing on a group of Suzhou artists of the mid-Ming dynasty (1368 – 1644). Originally used to describe realist poetry in the Tang dynasty (618 ‒ 907), shijing referred to the inspiration poets drew from the activities of daily life and travel as well as their poeticizing of mundane moments and life circumstances. Mid-Ming Suzhou literati artists avidly practiced this genre in their pictorial and poetic works, as manifested in their depictions of local sites, gardens, and the environs of Suzhou city, where they resided, as well as the commemoration of social and personal life events. But “real scene” paintings also highlighted their own “realness” by emphasizing the intelligibility of compositions and an aesthetic of the familiar. Thus, the literati asserted that beauty lay in the viewer’s perception of authenticity, as critic Yang Shen (1488 – 1559) commented: “Painting is like what is real, what is real is like painting (畫似真真似畫).” In this view, the instants and contingencies of the world of experience are the ultimate resources of human creativity, and artistic creation should instantiate or immortalize that world by evoking a sense of place or materializing human memory. This mutual evocation of the “real” and the “scenic” (or “painterly”) brought to the fore the questions, What is life? What is lifelikeness? Artists such as Wen Zhengming (1470 – 1559), a leading cultural figure of the day, brought vividness and veracity to his work through vigorous procedures of pictorial ordering (buzhi) and the accretive depiction of details (dianran). These two principles underpinned Wen’s sense that there were greater creative forces for generating the “lifelike aura” (shengqi) of a painted scene.

Mid-Ming Suzhou artists’ quests to make the world comprehensible
through art led them to seek inspiration from their own living environment. In Suzhou prefecture, in the lower Yangtze Delta, the land was crossed by numerous watercourses, and walkable spaces were connected by thousands of bridges. Thus navigating the physical environment necessitated pause and continuation, and people’s experiences of living in the place regularly involved contingencies and serendipities. As the land was parceled by water, division and connection were dialectical aesthetic measures in Suzhou artists’ pictorial compositions, which resulted in heterogeneous views of a collectively constructed Suzhou landscape. Therefore my book opens by considering the relationship between geo-aesthetics and painting practices and how people’s approach to living in and constructing the real world resonated with artists’ creation of their familiar and lived worlds in paintings. I argue that the artists’ attention to their living environment went beyond topographical representation to the level of an aesthetic engagement with the geophysical realities surrounding them.

The next two chapters of the book deal respectively with two prominent motifs in mid-Ming Suzhou paintings — the tree and the path — and how they reflected ways of world-making in relation to the human body. Special trees in public sites were thought to bear witness to the histories of places, preserve memories of the past, shelter the community for people’s well-being, and project the prosperity of future descendants. Wen depicted trees as tectonic forms that sheltered human bodies and created treescapes to embody the presence of cosmic forces. In a way similar to trees, paths indicate the presence of the human body, but unlike trees, which connect the ground with the sky, paths delineate and contain spaces on the ground, rendering a sense of the groundedness and the spatiotemporal sustainability of places. I consider the path as both form and process. As a form, the winding path produces infinite expansion of the pictorial space that resonates with the experience of slow walking while being immersed in delightful distractions, an effect that also prolongs the viewer’s empathetic looking at the painting by scrutinizing the details. I argue that the path as a process undergirded the importance of a trajectory of “becoming” in artistic creation, which signaled the literati’s valorization of slowness in the face of an impending economy of speed and efficiency that was then advancing with the growth of commerce and urbanization.

The creation and use of “real scene” paintings for social and communal events (such as birthday celebrations and farewell parties) is the subject of the final chapter of the book. In those cases, artists’ depictions of the experienced (or projected) scenes of the lives of their recipients implied associations between persons and places and between individuals and communities. I conclude that the components of the “real scene” are both life in places and painting as a place for immortalizing life.

Source

Related Research Reports

The Real Scene: Painting and Place in China, 1450 – 1550
Lihong Liu, A. W. Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow, 2014 – 2016